My new section here on my blog for the MCA Master Series has all its images backed by my Flickr account. I’m keeping an album on Flickr for any CD covers that are particularly rare or aren’t available in high quality. Like I semi-mentioned in my previous post, albums can be re-released by different labels or even by the same label and they may change or update the artwork. This is rather true for some of the MCA Master Series albums where the artist wants to break free from the consistent design imposed by the label. So in that case, I feel it’s important to preserve the album art consistent with the version I have, because whenever I search online for the artwork, I get the newest revision.
So, on Flickr, I have all my MCA Master Series covers, along with some others as I’ve been scanning them. As I was scrolling through the album, I noticed one of the covers had an abnormally high view count relative to my others. Like a 100:1 difference. The cover was Albert Lee – Gagged But Not Bound:
So I started to do some research. I wanted to know who found my scan and what they thought of it, good or bad. I looked for any Albert Lee fan sites/forums. I looked for album art blogs, I couldn’t find anything. I thought maybe it had ended up in Flickr’s Interesting list or maybe a group there. Nope.
I didn’t have a Flickr Pro account, so I couldn’t see any advanced statistics, like where the traffic was coming from. After a couple days of searching in vain, I broke down and paid for a Flickr Pro account. And of course, the stats weren’t historical. I had to wait for more people to view the image.
A couple days later, I checked up on it and sure enough, I had stats – useful stats. The cover was being found through Flickr search, not from an external website or search engine. That’s odd. Why would they find that image and not any of my others. Then I drilled in deeper and looked at the keywords being searched. Oh.
I guess people use Flickr to search for erotic bondage pictures. Photos involving people being “gagged” and “bound”. And, among their expected search results, my CD cover scan is in there, and it’s intriguing enough for them to click on. On one hand, I’m disappointed my stuff is being found in a search for a fetish, and on the other hand, I think it’s surprising that my stuff is actually interesting enough to be viewed in that context.