I recently watched a video on the dangers of “socialism.” It was an animation and was intended to be humorous while delivering its message. The illustration given was a classroom where it was announced that everyone would get the same grade, averaged from all the tests. After the first test, everyone got a B, the next test, everyone got a D, the last test, everyone got an F. This is how socialism works, apparently.
The problem with the illustration is that the subjects are of two distinct personalities: selfish and lazy, which is how anti-socialism people view the world. You are either selfish and in it for yourself only, which is why you are a capitalist, or you are lazy and don’t want to do anything, which is why socialism is so great for you.
The world is so full of absolutes right now, it’s disgusting. You are either Left or Right, Pro or Con. And that designation, aside from having no variance, also has no subsets. There will always be those that will fight for a cause and those that don’t care about it. There will always be people who care about doing a good job and those who don’t see the point in it.
Here’s an anti-socialist viewpoint: why have garbage cans on the street? Eventually everyone’s going to just throw their trash on the ground, because there’s no gain in using the garbage can. All the effort of trying to keep the streets clean is wasted on those that don’t care, so why bother. I mean, either you’re 100% for litter control, in which case you’d handle all of your trash needs yourself and have no need for government-subsidized garbage can entitlements, or you’re not, in which case the ground is your garbage can.
Flippant as it is, it exposes the hypocrisy of anti-socialists. If it’s something they support, good, otherwise, fuck off. These people want life to be a’la carte. They want to pick and choose every single piece of their life experience. So why not?
Yes, why not? Everyone bitches and moans about their tax dollars going to pay for something that they hate. So why not let them choose? Why not? I think we have enough diversity in America that everything would be funded as it’s needed. You’d have your rich, educated types diverting their tax money to education programs, earth and hippie types allocating for environmental causes, farmers propping up agriculture subsidies, rednecks and bulletheads giving all their tax dollars to defense. Despite all the stereotypes, it would all work out. And you’d have normal people allocating some here and some there, balancing things even further.
So all this stuff about Congress budgeting and allocating and taxing and robbing people to pay Paul, it all goes away. Each year, the income tax forms are collected and everyone has contributed a flat tax of 10%, 12%, 15%, whatever. Everyone has indicated on their tax form whether they want their taxes spread equally or according to the category assignments provided. You will actually have a tangible value assigned to the service, instead of “These people insist their service needs more funding.”